libtool-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch


From: Gary V. Vaughan
Subject: Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:22:07 +0800

Tag Ralf,

On 15 Jan 2008, at 03:24, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:

* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:29:05PM CET:
* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 05:23:24AM CET:
On 8 Jan 2008, at 04:40, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:

With this patch, I see in the log of
make distcheck

that the libltdl subdirectory is being configured. This is wrong, as libltdl in the Libtool package should be in nonrecursive mode rather than in subproject mode. This causes distcheck to fail. Can you fix
this?

I noticed this yesterday when I started the alpha release process too.
Yes, I'll figure this out before I go any further.

It is because _LTDL_SETUP calls _LTDL_MODE_DISPATCH which calls
AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS.  That's wrong, no?  Is that because implicitly
subproject-libltdl mode is assumed for the Libtool package?

OK to apply this fix (feeling a bit hackish, but does exactly what's
needed)?

Absolutely.  Sorry I didn't get to it sooner myself.  I can't think of a
cleaner way to tackle it myself off the top of my head, please go ahead
and commit.

2008-01-14  Ralf Wildenhues  <address@hidden>

        * configure.ac: Set libltdl nonrecursive option, to avoid
        configuring libltdl inside the Libtool package.

Cheers,
        Gary
--
  ())_.              Email me: address@hidden
  ( '/           Read my blog: http://blog.azazil.net
  / )=         ...and my book: http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
`(_~)_      Join my AGLOCO Network: http://www.agloco.com/r/BBBS7912



Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]