Re: Two small libltdl patches.

[Charles Wilson]

Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> On systems without argz we were exporting unmangled symbols argz_count
> and argz_add from libltdl. Not really a good idea. Rather than mangle
> the names, since we do not use either function, they were removed.

But wasn't there a thread back in June where we explicitly added a bunch
of argz functions, so that (a) we would be using the same file as
gnulib, and (b) that file would have a complete argz implementation?

Doesn't your patch fork our copy again? (Or have I missed some
intervening decisions/development)?

--
Chuck