libtool-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Use Get/SetThreadErrorMode if it is available (on Windows 7 and abov


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: Use Get/SetThreadErrorMode if it is available (on Windows 7 and above).
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:43:11 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-10-28)

Hello Peter,

* Peter Rosin wrote on Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 11:55:16AM CET:
> 2010-01-21  Peter Rosin  <address@hidden>
> 
>       Use Get/SetThreadErrorMode if they are available.
>       * libltdl/loaders/loadlibrary.c (wrap_geterrormode): Replaced...
>       (wrap_getthreaderrormode): ...by this function that checks
>       first for GetThreadErrorMode, then GetErrorMode and makes use
>       of either of those or...
>       (fallback_getthreaderrormode): ...else falls back to this
>       replacement function that implements the old workaround, which
>       was previously implemented in...
>       (fallback_geterrormode): ...this now renamed function.
>       (geterrormode): Replaced...
>       (getthreaderrormode): ...by this function pointer that points
>       at either of wrap_getthreaderrormode, GetThreadErrorMode,
>       GetErrorMode or fallback_getthreaderrormode.
>       (wrap_setthreaderrormode): New function that checks if
>       SetThreadErrorMode is supported by the system and makes use of
>       it if it is.
>       (fallback_setthreaderrormode): New function that is used
>       otherwise that implements the old version using SetErrorMode.
>       (setthreaderrormode): New function pointer that points at
>       either of wrap_setthreaderrormode, SetThreadErrorMode or
>       fallback_setthreaderrormode.
>       (vm_open): Adjust to the above.

I cannot see big problems with this patch from looking over it.
I think GCS wants no whitespace after opening parentheses, you could
line-wrap before '='.

When you use GetProcAdress in the setup function, you may be setting the
error that can be read with GetLastError.  Is there a chance the code
(since your last patch) interferes with a previous error set there?

Thanks,
Ralf




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]