[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: somewhat misleading -no-undefined documentation
|
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
|
Subject: |
Re: somewhat misleading -no-undefined documentation |
|
Date: |
Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:40:05 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04) |
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 12:27:35PM CEST:
> 2010-10-09 Simon Josefsson <address@hidden>
> Matěj Týč <address@hidden>
> Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden>
>
> docs: improve description of -no-undefined.
> * doc/libtool.texi (Link mode): Fix -no-undefined description.
> (Inter-library dependencies): Use Windows not AIX as example
> system. Clarify need for symbol resolution at library creation
> time.
No comments, I've pushed the patch now.
Cheers,
Ralf