[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Libunwind-devel] [PATCH] restore "x0" and "x1" registers
From: |
Arun Sharma |
Subject: |
Re: [Libunwind-devel] [PATCH] restore "x0" and "x1" registers |
Date: |
Sat, 4 Oct 2014 08:38:16 -0700 |
On Sat, Oct 4, 2014 at 7:09 AM, <address@hidden> wrote:
> Did you guys need more details or can commit the patch. Thanks
Yes. Some more context on your use case would help.
I suppose you want people to be able to write exception handlers that
modify the scratch registers and then resume.
In that case you should only be touching code paths guarded by
(c->sigcontext_format != AARCH64_SCF_NONE).
But the patch seems to touch the normal (call/return) path as well. Why?
-Arun
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] [PATCH] restore "x0" and "x1" registers, cbergstrom, 2014/10/04
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] [PATCH] restore "x0" and "x1" registers,
Arun Sharma <=
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] [PATCH] restore "x0" and "x1" registers, Yvan Roux, 2014/10/06
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] [PATCH] restore "x0" and "x1" registers, C Bergström, 2014/10/07
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] [PATCH] restore "x0" and "x1" registers, C Bergström, 2014/10/08
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] [PATCH] restore "x0" and "x1" registers, Arun Sharma, 2014/10/09
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] [PATCH] restore "x0" and "x1" registers, cbergstrom, 2014/10/09
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] [PATCH] restore "x0" and "x1" registers, Arun Sharma, 2014/10/10
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] [PATCH] restore "x0" and "x1" registers, Yvan Roux, 2014/10/10
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] [PATCH] restore "x0" and "x1" registers, C Bergström, 2014/10/19
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] [PATCH] restore "x0" and "x1" registers, C Bergström, 2014/10/25
- Re: [Libunwind-devel] [PATCH] restore "x0" and "x1" registers, Arun Sharma, 2014/10/25