Re: [Libunwind-devel] Plan for future releases?

[C Bergström]

I would consider distro to be downstream, but.. we (PathScale) have
also tried to get some patches included - AArch64, Power8 and Solaris
related. I also think it's time for the project to accept cmake as an
option if not default build system. (Feedback welcomed)

David - thanks for pushing for this

On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 3:03 PM, David Abdurachmanov
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> On 14 Feb 2016, at 03:46, Arun Sharma <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Hello, I'm glad to hear that you're getting better results from
>> master. I'm happy to make a 1.2 tar ball in the next few days.
>
> Linux distributions tend to package tagged software, thus e.g.
> Fedora is still at 1.1 + extra patches.
>
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/libunwind.git/tree/libunwind.spec
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/libunwind.git/tree/
>
> E.g. the whole AArch64 support is as out-of-tree patch.
>
> I would suggest to review the patches they (and others, e.g. Debian) have.
>
> I could run test suite on x86_64/CentOS 6 & 7, aarch64/CentOS 7,
> ppc64le/Fedora 22 and ppc64/Fedora 22 once you have release candidate.
>
> david
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libunwind-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libunwind-devel