[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Libunwind-devel] [PATCH] Re: dl_iterate_phdr deadlock in unw_step
From: |
Milian Wolff |
Subject: |
Re: [Libunwind-devel] [PATCH] Re: dl_iterate_phdr deadlock in unw_step |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:20:36 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/5.1.68 (Linux/4.4.1-2-ARCH; KDE/5.20.0; x86_64; git-ee0e08e; 2016-02-20) |
On Dienstag, 23. Februar 2016 17:41:55 CET Jonathan Byrd wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 at 16:10:51 Arun Sharma wrote:
> > The only known work around is to
> > implement your own dl_iterate_phdr that doesn't call malloc by hooking
> > into low level APIs that notify you every time a new shared object is
> > loaded.
>
> The attached patch adds the function 'unw_set_iterate_phdr_function' to
> the libunwind API, allowing a custom implementation of dl_iterate_phdr()
> to be hooked in. That implementation would need to maintain a local
> cache (or however else you wanted to manage it) to remove the need for
> taking the glibc loader lock.
Nice, I played around with this patch yesterday and it seems to work quite
nicely. In my implementation, I cached the results from a dl_iterate_phdr call
which seems to stay valid until the next dlopen/dlclose call is issued, at
which point I invalidate the cache and update it on demand the next time then.
For my use-case (heaptrack) I think I'll be able to leverage this to gain a
considerable performance boost: Instead of serializing the individual
iterations, I should be able to use a shared mutex. I.e. only updating the
cache as a write operation must be serialized while the read operations can be
done in parallel.
So +1 from my side to get this patch in.
Cheers!
--
Milian Wolff
address@hidden
http://milianw.de
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.