[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Lilypond-auto] Issue 3077 in lilypond: Patch: Be more explicit about fo
|
From: |
lilypond |
|
Subject: |
[Lilypond-auto] Issue 3077 in lilypond: Patch: Be more explicit about footnotes on chord constituents |
|
Date: |
Wed, 02 Jan 2013 11:04:10 +0000 |
Status: Started
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Enhancement Patch-new
New issue 3077 by address@hidden: Patch: Be more explicit about footnotes on
chord constituents
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3077
Be more explicit about footnotes on chord constituents
This tries to deal with the suggestions stemming from the
<URL:http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-01/msg00021.html>
discussion. It also rewords a bit of following documentation.
http://codereview.appspot.com/7038047
- [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3077 in lilypond: Patch: Be more explicit about footnotes on chord constituents,
lilypond <=
- Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3077 in lilypond: Patch: Be more explicit about footnotes on chord constituents, lilypond, 2013/01/02
- Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3077 in lilypond: Patch: Be more explicit about footnotes on chord constituents, lilypond, 2013/01/02
- Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3077 in lilypond: Patch: Be more explicit about footnotes on chord constituents, lilypond, 2013/01/06
- Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3077 in lilypond: Patch: Be more explicit about footnotes on chord constituents, lilypond, 2013/01/06
- Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3077 in lilypond: Patch: Be more explicit about footnotes on chord constituents, lilypond, 2013/01/14