[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3255 in lilypond: \with-dimensions doesn't wor
From: |
lilypond |
Subject: |
Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3255 in lilypond: \with-dimensions doesn't work |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Mar 2013 05:22:39 +0000 |
Updates:
Summary: \with-dimensions doesn't work
Comment #15 on issue 3255 by address@hidden: \with-dimensions doesn't
work
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3255
Any user writing the \with-dimensions command is rather explicitly
requesting that the object be spaced with a simple box outline.
Maybe \pad-around could be generalized as suggested in the comment above.
Neither one works in version 2.17.14 (with positive, zero, or negative
values) as seen with the example below (using a short but positive
horizontal-extent so that the recent desired changes regarding zero-width
objects to not confuse the issue.)
{ g1
% -\tweak #'vertical-skylines
% #(ly:make-unpure-pure-container
% ly:grob::simple-vertical-skylines-from-extents
% ly:grob::pure-simple-vertical-skylines-from-extents)
-\markup { \with-dimensions #'(0 . 1) #'(-3 . 3) "tall" }
-"bar"
g1
% -\tweak #'vertical-skylines
% #(ly:make-unpure-pure-container
% ly:grob::simple-vertical-skylines-from-extents
% ly:grob::pure-simple-vertical-skylines-from-extents)
-\markup { \pad-around #3 "tall" }
-"bar" }
If the commented-out tweaks can be put into the function definitions, we
would regain the old behavior.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3255 in lilypond: \with-dimensions doesn't work,
lilypond <=