[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3255 in lilypond: \with-dimensions doesn't aff
From: |
lilypond |
Subject: |
Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3255 in lilypond: \with-dimensions doesn't affect the overall size of a TextScript |
Date: |
Wed, 15 May 2013 19:24:07 +0000 |
Updates:
Summary: \with-dimensions doesn't affect the overall size of a
TextScript
Comment #19 on issue 3255 by address@hidden: \with-dimensions doesn't
affect the overall size of a TextScript
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3255
It is awkward to implement the workaround in comment #15, because as
mentioned in comment #5 \with-dimensions works on what could be just one
part of a markup that might or might not end up in a TextScript. The
resulting behavior of considering the whole TextScript as a box if any part
of it used \with-dimensions, would be similarly awkward.
Probably best to tag only the piece of markup with the explicit dimensions,
so that when skyline-builder sees that tag it uses the extent box rather
than stencil for that piece. Then \with-dimensions would be spaced like a
\page-ref after issue 3337.
{ \override TextScript.outside-staff-priority = ##f
c''1-\markup \page-ref #'bogus
\with-dimensions #'(0 . 0) #'(0 . 0) "foo"
\with-dimensions #'(0 . 0) #'(0 . 0) "foo"
-\f }
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings
- Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3255 in lilypond: \with-dimensions doesn't affect the overall size of a TextScript,
lilypond <=