[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3496 in lilypond: Path expansion in lilypond-b
From: |
lilypond |
Subject: |
Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3496 in lilypond: Path expansion in lilypond-book (and others) |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Aug 2013 17:59:51 +0000 |
Comment #1 on issue 3496 by address@hidden: Path expansion in lilypond-book
(and others)
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3496
/bin is (rightly from the old days of Unix Edition 6) before /usr/bin in
my PATH.
I think that's the wrong order. /bin is supposed to contain basic (and
typically statically linked) binaries that work for getting the system up
and running before /usr or anything else is mounted. When /usr/bin is
available, its binaries should usually be preferred over /usr.
I think the right thing to do will be to add os.path.realpath to expand
any symbolic links
No, this strategy won't work. In a development tree, out/bin/lilypond is a
symbolic link to lily/out/lilypond. The former in argv[0] makes it
possible for LilyPond to find its directories, the latter doesn't. So
resolving symlinks will stop _all_ development copies of LilyPond from
working rather than just those from people having a symlink arrangement for
/bin and /usr/bin and having the strange order of /bin before /usr/bin.
So the proposed cure is worse than the problem.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings