[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New figured bass capabilities and some request
From: |
John Mandereau |
Subject: |
Re: New figured bass capabilities and some request |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Oct 2005 12:05:08 +0200 |
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> John Mandereau wrote:
> > +4 is enough; there are never both "+" and an alteration on a number.
> > I'd like the "+" behaves like an alteration: it can be appended to any
> > number (not only +6 and +4 are used, but also +7 and +2), and its
> > direction can be set the same way with figuredBassAlterationDirection.
>
> OK, but the + and sharp/flats are used in the same chords, and in
> general, they are mixed (so making a style property won't do)
>
I'm not sure I understand: do you mean the
figuredBassAlterationDirection style property can't denote the same
direction for sharps/flats/+ at the same time?
--
John Mandereau <address@hidden>
- New figured bass capabilities and some request, Matevz Jekovec, 2005/10/09
- Re: New figured bass capabilities and some request, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/10/09
- Re: New figured bass capabilities and some request, John Mandereau, 2005/10/15
- Re: New figured bass capabilities and some request, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/10/15
- Re: New figured bass capabilities and some request, John Mandereau, 2005/10/15
- Re: New figured bass capabilities and some request, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/10/15
- Re: New figured bass capabilities and some request, John Mandereau, 2005/10/16
- Re: New figured bass capabilities and some request, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/10/16
- Re: New figured bass capabilities and some request,
John Mandereau <=
- Re: New figured bass capabilities and some request, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/10/16
- Re: New figured bass capabilities and some request, Erik Sandberg, 2005/10/16
- Re: New figured bass capabilities and some request, John Mandereau, 2005/10/16
Re: New figured bass capabilities and some request, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/10/09