[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: a new lilypond build failure
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: a new lilypond build failure |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Oct 2005 10:52:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> then again, who actually uses these recipes?
Now I remember, we used to have debian repackagers of development
releases for debian stable and debian unstable.
Anyway, what I'd really like to do is to build debs of any software
that I need which is not in Debian (mostly new releases or CVS), and
install in a writable ~/.unionfs overlay of /. For that to work, we
not only need an efficient unionfs that works with fuse (or a unionfs
translator for the Hurd), but also an up to date ./debian directory in
every software package that I need. I was thinking of doing our part
with LilyPond, but the idea is not really taking off.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
- Re: a new lilypond build failure, (continued)
- Re: a new lilypond build failure, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/10/24
- Re: a new lilypond build failure, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/10/24
- Re: a new lilypond build failure, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/10/24
- Re: a new lilypond build failure, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/10/24
- lilypond packaging, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/10/23
- Re: lilypond packaging, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/10/23