[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: git hang-ups
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: git hang-ups |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:18:20 -0700 (PDT) |
Graham Percival wrote:
> If you do restart, try the
> git clone --depth 1 git://URL
> method. (the CG will probably be updated to use this method in a
> week or so)
Graham,
it seems that this method is not suitable for developers with
push access. You can't push from it -- see below.
- Mark
--depth <depth>
Create a shallow clone with a history truncated to the specified
number of revisions. A shallow repository has a number of
limitations (you cannot clone or fetch from it, nor push from nor
into it), but is adequate if you are only interested in the recent
history of a large project with a long history, and would want to
send in fixes as patches.
- Re: git hang-ups, (continued)
- Re: git hang-ups, Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/02
- Re: git hang-ups, Mark Polesky, 2009/08/02
- Re: git hang-ups, Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/02
- Re: git hang-ups, Mark Polesky, 2009/08/02
- Re: git hang-ups, Mark Polesky, 2009/08/02
- Re: git hang-ups, Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/03
- Re: git hang-ups, Graham Percival, 2009/08/03
- Re: git hang-ups, Mark Polesky, 2009/08/03
- Message not available
- Re: git hang-ups, Mark Polesky, 2009/08/03
- Re: git hang-ups, Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/03
- Re: git hang-ups,
Mark Polesky <=
- Re: git hang-ups, Graham Percival, 2009/08/03
- Re: git hang-ups, Mark Polesky, 2009/08/04
- Re: git hang-ups, Graham Percival, 2009/08/04
- Re: git hang-ups, Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/04
- Re: git hang-ups, Mark Polesky, 2009/08/04
- Re: git hang-ups, Patrick McCarty, 2009/08/07
- Re: git hang-ups, Mark Polesky, 2009/08/07
- Re: git hang-ups, Patrick McCarty, 2009/08/07
- Re: git hang-ups, John Mandereau, 2009/08/08
- Re: git hang-ups, Trevor Daniels, 2009/08/08