[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should Dot_column_engraver be in Voice instead of Staff?
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: Should Dot_column_engraver be in Voice instead of Staff? |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Aug 2009 07:06:19 -0700 (PDT) |
Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
> I think even this simple case might fail if the dots were placed in
> the Voice context:
> << c''4. \\ b'4. >>
Yes, but I would consider this a "mesh". If there is a way to test
for that, this situation would not qualify for moving the engraver
to the Voice context.
- Mark
- Re: Should Dot_column_engraver be in Voice instead of Staff?, (continued)
- Re: Should Dot_column_engraver be in Voice instead of Staff?, Mark Polesky, 2009/08/05
- Re: Should Dot_column_engraver be in Voice instead of Staff?, Neil Puttock, 2009/08/05
- Re: Should Dot_column_engraver be in Voice instead of Staff?, Mark Polesky, 2009/08/05
- Re: Should Dot_column_engraver be in Voice instead of Staff?, Neil Puttock, 2009/08/05
- Re: Should Dot_column_engraver be in Voice instead of Staff?, Mark Polesky, 2009/08/05
- Re: Should Dot_column_engraver be in Voice instead of Staff?, Mark Polesky, 2009/08/05
- Re: Should Dot_column_engraver be in Voice instead of Staff?, John Mandereau, 2009/08/05
- Re: Should Dot_column_engraver be in Voice instead of Staff?, Mark Polesky, 2009/08/06
- Re: Should Dot_column_engraver be in Voice instead of Staff?, Andrew Hawryluk, 2009/08/06
- Re: Should Dot_column_engraver be in Voice instead of Staff?, David Kastrup, 2009/08/06
- Re: Should Dot_column_engraver be in Voice instead of Staff?,
Mark Polesky <=