|
From: | Dan Eble |
Subject: | Re: alternatives not taken into account in automatic accidentals |
Date: | Sun, 9 Aug 2009 18:28:48 -0400 |
On 9 Aug 2009, at 18:21, Mark Polesky wrote:
Dan Eble wrote:I appreciate your reply. Applying this statement to certain other figures (e.g. key signature or clef) would indicate a bug. Does a non-functional bar line differ from those?I wouldn't apply that statement to other figures. This is a specific behavior of the \bar command.
OK, but what I was trying to ask is, is it a *correct* behavior of the \bar command? Saying that something is so differs from saying that it should be so.
I'll try to look at this at some point. - Mark
Thanks, -- Dan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |