[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: integration of general/web in main
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: integration of general/web in main |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Aug 2009 07:50:08 -0600 |
On 8/15/09 1:43 AM, "Jan Nieuwenhuizen" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Op vrijdag 14-08-2009 om 23:51 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
> Percival:
>
>> BTW, why don't we want to credit texinfo and texi2html?
>
> - I would hardly want to advise others to use it. For me personally
> it is a maintenance nightmare that I would want to get rid of.
> 25.000 lines of questionable perl. I cannot imagine that the
> functionality we need could not be done in 2000 lines of
> clean, maintainable python -- and we would hardly mention such
> a possibly better solution on our site: made by
> scripts/auxilar/2html.py ?
>
I think that John Mandereau is working on the 2000 lines of python we would
need to parse texinfo. We may be close to this in the next couple of
months!
Carl
- Re: Web examples now in master. (was: integrating), (continued)
- Re: Web examples now in master. (was: integrating), Graham Percival, 2009/08/15
- Re: Web examples now in master., David Kastrup, 2009/08/16
- Re: integration of general/web in main, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/08/14
- Re: integration of general/web in main, John Mandereau, 2009/08/14
- Re: integration of general/web in main, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/08/14
- Re: integration of general/web in main, Patrick McCarty, 2009/08/14
- Re: integration of general/web in main, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/08/14
- Re: integration of general/web in main, Graham Percival, 2009/08/15
- Re: integration of general/web in main, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/08/15
- Re: integration of general/web in main, Graham Percival, 2009/08/15
- Re: integration of general/web in main,
Carl Sorensen <=
- Re: integration of general/web in main, John Mandereau, 2009/08/16
- Re: integration of general/web in main, John Mandereau, 2009/08/16