|
From: | Jan Warchoł |
Subject: | Re: Doc: NR rewrite of 3.2 Titles and Headers (issue4124056) |
Date: | Mon, 23 May 2011 12:30:33 +0200 |
On 2011/05/05 23:06:25, Graham Percival wrote:
http://codereview.appspot.com/4124056/diff/32001/Documentation/notation/input.itely
File Documentation/notation/input.itely (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4124056/diff/32001/Documentation/notation/input.itely#newcode674
Documentation/notation/input.itely:674: @exampleasking for
On 2011/05/05 11:05:22, J_lowe wrote:
> Yes we did, you'll also remember that you sent out an email to dev
> help as I struggled to get this working
No, it's worse than that -- I sent an email to the *user* list.Almost every
user knows the answer. Certainly anybody who asks about scheme orpage layout
knows the answer.
> and it seemed to me that there are some
> very specific places where it will and won't work.
It's not any more or less specific than any other type of layoutcommand.
> :(
Yes, definitely.
I'll poke people again.
Thanks, with that and my going back and re-reading the replies I have
come up with an example and a para before the example, which I think
might be a bit convoluted :) comments welcome.
Nearly there I think?
http://codereview.appspot.com/4124056/
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |