[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: no movement on Critical issues; 2.16 in Oct ?
|
From: |
Wols Lists |
|
Subject: |
Re: no movement on Critical issues; 2.16 in Oct ? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 31 Jul 2011 17:51:12 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110713 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
On 31/07/11 17:47, David Kastrup wrote:
> Windows 2000 (not NT-based IIRC) does not usefully employ memory
> protection IIRC, so likely Cygwin does not add all too much on top.
Windows 2000 most definitely IS NT-based. You're thinking of Windows ME,
which is the last of the DOS7/Win9x line.
Cheers,
Wol
- no movement on Critical issues; 2.16 in Oct ?, Graham Percival, 2011/07/31
- Re: no movement on Critical issues; 2.16 in Oct ?, David Kastrup, 2011/07/31
- Re: no movement on Critical issues; 2.16 in Oct ?, Graham Percival, 2011/07/31
- Re: no movement on Critical issues; 2.16 in Oct ?, David Kastrup, 2011/07/31
- Re: no movement on Critical issues; 2.16 in Oct ?, Graham Percival, 2011/07/31
- Re: no movement on Critical issues; 2.16 in Oct ?, David Kastrup, 2011/07/31
- Re: no movement on Critical issues; 2.16 in Oct ?, Graham Percival, 2011/07/31
- Re: no movement on Critical issues; 2.16 in Oct ?, David Kastrup, 2011/07/31
- Re: no movement on Critical issues; 2.16 in Oct ?,
Wols Lists <=
- Re: no movement on Critical issues; 2.16 in Oct ?, David Kastrup, 2011/07/31
- Re: no movement on Critical issues; 2.16 in Oct ?, David Kastrup, 2011/07/31
- Re: no movement on Critical issues; 2.16 in Oct ?, Jan WarchoĊ, 2011/07/31
Re: no movement on Critical issues; 2.16 in Oct ?, Trevor Daniels, 2011/07/31
Re: no movement on Critical issues; 2.16 in Oct ?, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2011/07/31