[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: do we want special versions of the accidentals for use with text?
|
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
|
Subject: |
Re: do we want special versions of the accidentals for use with text? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:42:04 +0200 (CEST) |
> I'm not sure i understand - are you saying that we should always
> align accidentals like in attached 'blah.png'?
Yes, but in this image, the baseline for the sharp is far too high
(this is, the accidental is positioned too low) and both accidentals
are slightly too big.
Werner
- Re: do we want special versions of the accidentals for use with text?, (continued)
- Re: do we want special versions of the accidentals for use with text?, Janek Warchoł, 2011/09/20
- Re: do we want special versions of the accidentals for use with text?, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/09/21
- Re: do we want special versions of the accidentals for use with text?, address@hidden, 2011/09/21
- Re: do we want special versions of the accidentals for use with text?, Janek Warchoł, 2011/09/26
- Re: do we want special versions of the accidentals for use with text?, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/09/27
- Re: do we want special versions of the accidentals for use with text?, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/09/27
- Re: do we want special versions of the accidentals for use with text?, Janek Warchoł, 2011/09/27
- Re: do we want special versions of the accidentals for use with text?, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/09/28
- Re: do we want special versions of the accidentals for use with text?, Janek Warchoł, 2011/09/28
- Re: do we want special versions of the accidentals for use with text?, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2011/09/28
- Re: do we want special versions of the accidentals for use with text?,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: do we want special versions of the accidentals for use with text?, Janek Warchoł, 2011/09/28