[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: upgrade to c++11
From: |
Frédéric Bron |
Subject: |
Re: upgrade to c++11 |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Jul 2013 20:12:22 +0200 |
> Change them so that they will fail using anything but C++11? That
> sounds like it would not buy us anything but trouble at the current
> point of time.
OK, I forget that.
I see that boost is not used. Is it deliberate? These are c++03
libraries and most of them have been the source of the new standard.
They are pretty well supported by distributions and work on windows,
mac, linux.
Frédéric
- upgrade to c++11, Frédéric Bron, 2013/07/14
- Re: upgrade to c++11, immanuel litzroth, 2013/07/14
- Re: upgrade to c++11, David Kastrup, 2013/07/14
- Re: upgrade to c++11,
Frédéric Bron <=
- Re: upgrade to c++11, David Kastrup, 2013/07/14
- Re: upgrade to c++11, immanuel litzroth, 2013/07/14
- Re: upgrade to c++11, David Kastrup, 2013/07/14
- Re: upgrade to c++11, immanuel litzroth, 2013/07/14
- Re: upgrade to c++11, David Kastrup, 2013/07/14
- Re: upgrade to c++11, Frédéric Bron, 2013/07/14
- Re: upgrade to c++11, David Kastrup, 2013/07/14
- Re: upgrade to c++11, Alexander Kobel, 2013/07/15
- Re: upgrade to c++11, Benkő Pál, 2013/07/20