|
From: | dak |
Subject: | Re: Changes from LSR doc run (issue 116040043 by address@hidden) |
Date: | Sun, 20 Jul 2014 16:37:01 +0000 |
https://codereview.appspot.com/116040043/diff/30001/Documentation/snippets/adding-indicators-to-staves-which-get-split-after-a-break.ly File Documentation/snippets/adding-indicators-to-staves-which-get-split-after-a-break.ly (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/116040043/diff/30001/Documentation/snippets/adding-indicators-to-staves-which-get-split-after-a-break.ly#newcode22 Documentation/snippets/adding-indicators-to-staves-which-get-split-after-a-break.ly:22: %{ Original snippet : An outcommented "original snippet"? If the original snippet is of separate value, it should be a separate snippet. https://codereview.appspot.com/116040043/diff/30001/Documentation/snippets/adding-indicators-to-staves-which-get-split-after-a-break.ly#newcode136 Documentation/snippets/adding-indicators-to-staves-which-get-split-after-a-break.ly:136: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% ATTENTION %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Big block comments in French? In this form I'd lean towards removing the snippet from the import list if that's feasible. https://codereview.appspot.com/116040043/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |