[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C++ standards
From: |
Hans Åberg |
Subject: |
Re: C++ standards |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Jul 2018 00:36:30 +0200 |
> On 6 Jul 2018, at 00:17, Dan Eble <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Jul 5, 2018, at 15:20, Hans Åberg <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> On 5 Jul 2018, at 20:02, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>> What C++ standard should we be able to ask for? I think that at the
>>> current point of time, C++11 should be reasonably fine for the asking.
>>
>> The g++7 default, and clang++6, is C++14, but supports C++17 with the
>> --std=c++17 flag.
>
> Good angle. At my place of employment, rather than ask which C++ version to
> use, they determine which minimum versions of which compilers to require and
> then enable the latest commonly supported standard.
Yes, that is what you might have to consider for LilyPond, too.
Re: C++ standards, Hans Åberg, 2018/07/05
Re: C++ standards, Knut Petersen, 2018/07/06