[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What is holding up 2.20 release?
From: |
Simon Albrecht |
Subject: |
Re: What is holding up 2.20 release? |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Nov 2019 01:30:14 +0100 |
I would like to give whatever small contribution I can make to this
without knowing so much on the technical levels; please do tell me
whether I say below is considered helpful.
On 18.11.19 18:10, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
965a607096 Fix #1367: NoteNames context in any language
not sure, has quite some changes in lily/ and scm/
This seems like a new feature to me that shouldn’t be picked.
ed86e71eb0 Use "simple strings" rather than #"hash-prefixed Scheme strings"
not sure: It's a very large commit, mostly in Documentation/ and
input/, but also in ly/...
This seems pretty trivial and innocuous to me; also for a major release
it is much desirable to uniformly adapt new syntax, I think.
2afb45bd85 Issue 5489/1: improve prall glyphs
It says "fix erroneous shape of pralldown/prallup" in the commit
description, not sure if we want to pick this...
IMO this is so much non-critical that it should only be picked if the
change is very innocuous, which I can’t tell if it is.
9c0e1363ac Issue #5506: Add tremolo stem support to \cueDuring
Looks like a small new "feature", not picked for now.
Here I’d say this is not a new feature, but a bug fix, and the
mechanisms used for the change are secure enough to pick it. Again, my 2cts.
Thanks for your efforts.
Best, Simon
- Re: What is holding up 2.20 release?, (continued)
Re: What is holding up 2.20 release?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2019/11/18
Re: What is holding up 2.20 release?,
Simon Albrecht <=
Re: Re: What is holding up 2.20 release?, Mats Bengtsson, 2019/11/19
Re: What is holding up 2.20 release?, Adam Good, 2019/11/19
Re: What is holding up 2.20 release?, Malte Meyn, 2019/11/26