[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: macOS 64-bit
From: |
Hans Åberg |
Subject: |
Re: macOS 64-bit |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Jan 2020 23:18:05 +0100 |
> On 7 Jan 2020, at 22:35, Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond
> development <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> By far no Mac expert, but if dynamic libraries are problematic would it
> help to have a static executable? I experimented with such a setup for
> Linux, and I eventually got it to build. Not sure what the status of my
> script is, I can try to dig it up…
Dynamic libraries have long been the default on MacOS, but the paths are
hardcoded into the binary. So I figure an app needs relative paths to its
resources.
- Re: macOS 64-bit, (continued)
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Carl Sorensen, 2020/01/11
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Kieren MacMillan, 2020/01/11
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Carl Sorensen, 2020/01/11
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2020/01/12
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2020/01/13
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Karlin High, 2020/01/13
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2020/01/09
- Message not available
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2020/01/09
Re: macOS 64-bit, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/01/07
- Re: macOS 64-bit, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2020/01/07
- Re: macOS 64-bit,
Hans Åberg <=