Re: stale git branches

[Jonas Hahnfeld]

Am Samstag, den 11.04.2020, 14:48 +0200 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 2:13 PM Jonas Hahnfeld <
> address@hidden
> > wrote:
> > following removal of dev/translation-* branches, I took a closer look
> > at stale branches. I think it would make sense to keep unscoped
> > branches (outside of dev/user/) to a minimum. This should also avoid
> > overlooking old changes that have not been merged yet.
> > The following list is by no means complete, but maybe a good start:
> > 
> > dev/pango contains commits:
> > 53ed2b55e2 Add a RAII wrapper for extracting FT_Face from PangoFcFont
> > c93c477180 Make Pango >= 1.36 mandatory.
> > in master:
> > 9cf8d35e8c Add a RAII wrapper for extracting FT_Face from PangoFcFont
> > 15b7118410 Make Pango >= 1.36 mandatory.
> > I'm fairly certain the branch can be removed.
> 
> This can be removed. It was a staging area when David wanted to revert
> said patch from staging.

Ah, now I remember. Deleted (as David noted, a rebase resulted in empty
commits).

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part