[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Refactor get/set_property to take the item as first argument (issue
|
From: |
v . villenave |
|
Subject: |
Re: Refactor get/set_property to take the item as first argument (issue 573670043 by address@hidden) |
|
Date: |
Fri, 24 Apr 2020 01:15:09 -0700 |
On 2020/04/24 07:20:55, hahnjo wrote:
> If there are no technical objections, I think we should move
> forward and let something as big sit around for too long.
Just for clarification, did you miss a "not" in that sentence?
Cheers,
- V.
https://codereview.appspot.com/573670043/
Re: Refactor get/set_property to take the item as first argument (issue 573670043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/04/12
Re: Refactor get/set_property to take the item as first argument (issue 573670043 by address@hidden), nine . fierce . ballads, 2020/04/13
Re: Refactor get/set_property to take the item as first argument (issue 573670043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/04/13
Re: Refactor get/set_property to take the item as first argument (issue 573670043 by address@hidden), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2020/04/13
Re: Refactor get/set_property to take the item as first argument (issue 573670043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/04/24
Re: Refactor get/set_property to take the item as first argument (issue 573670043 by address@hidden),
v . villenave <=
Re: Refactor get/set_property to take the item as first argument (issue 573670043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/04/24