[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@h
From: |
jonas . hahnfeld |
Subject: |
Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden) |
Date: |
Sat, 02 May 2020 03:20:25 -0700 |
On 2020/05/02 10:12:45, hanwenn wrote:
> On Sat, May 2, 2020 at 12:09 PM <mailto:address@hidden>
wrote:
>
> > > This version of LilyPond has been compiled and linked with a
version
> > > of Ghostscript licensed under the AGPL.
> >
> > Please re-read point 2 above. Old Ghostscript versions are not AGPL
and
> > other implementations may not be either.
>
> it's easy to discover if GS is AGPL or not (assuming that the command
> line binary is the same as the API we're linking):
>
> $ gs
> GPL Ghostscript 9.27 (2019-04-04)
> Copyright (C) 2018 Artifex Software, Inc. All rights reserved.
> This software is supplied under the GNU AGPLv3 and comes with NO
WARRANTY:
> see the file COPYING for details.
That's a bold claim that may often hold, but not always. Feel free to do
this change after this one landed, but I'm certainly not going to give
imperfect legal advice.
> (BTW, I've been unable to find the GS API on fedora 31 :-/ )
https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/libgs-devel/ ?
https://codereview.appspot.com/548030043/
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), (continued)
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/05/01
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/05/01
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), v . villenave, 2020/05/01
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/05/01
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/05/02
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/05/02
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/05/02
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/05/02
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden),
jonas . hahnfeld <=
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/05/02
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/05/02
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/05/02
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), hanwenn, 2020/05/02
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/05/03
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/05/03
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/05/03
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), dak, 2020/05/03
- Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden), jonas . hahnfeld, 2020/05/06