[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Access to push new branch to origin
From: |
Urs Liska |
Subject: |
Re: Access to push new branch to origin |
Date: |
Mon, 25 May 2020 21:13:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.36.2-1 |
Am Montag, den 25.05.2020, 20:30 +0200 schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld:
> Am Samstag, den 23.05.2020, 16:38 +0200 schrieb Urs Liska:
> > Am 23. Mai 2020 15:01:11 MESZ schrieb Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden>:
> > > > I can grant you access to the repository later today if needed.
> > > > However I'd first like to understand (probably from Werner)
> > > > what
> > > > makes a branch in the upstream repository more "preserving"
> > > > than a
> > > > public clone. Being distributed it really doesn't make much
> > > > difference from the git perspective.
> > >
> > > IMO, code for a LilyPond GSoC project should become an integral
> > > part
> > > of the master git repository. I think it should be freezed in
> > > its
> > > final form (this is, right after GSoC ends) for documentation
> > > purposes. If the stuff gets merged, the branch should still stay
> > > and
> > > not be deleted.
> > >
> > > Note that this is my personal point of view, and I don't insist
> > > on it.
> > > On the other hand: if you see problems with that approach please
> > > elaborate.
> >
> > I would second that a student who has been accepted to GSoC should
> > be considered part of the team and grantwd push access, as long as
> > there are regulations preventing them from accidentally pushing to
> > master.
>
> Invited @WolfGangsta to the lilypond group.
While we're at it, I'd be happy to be part of the group too.
Urs