[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ready for 2.21.80?
From: |
Jonas Hahnfeld |
Subject: |
Re: ready for 2.21.80? |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Oct 2020 19:57:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.38.1 |
Am Sonntag, den 25.10.2020, 19:29 +0100 schrieb Jean-Charles
Malahieude:
> Le 25/10/2020 à 19:13, Jonas Hahnfeld a écrit :
> >
> > I can try to help if I understand the problem in detail. As you mention
> > the NR, you're probably referring to the Selected Snippets / Morceaux
> > choisis? The first example would be:
> > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.21/Documentation/notation/writing-pitches.fr.html#accidentals
> > Are you saying that you're seeing the English text instead?
> >
>
> Exactly. And it's the same everywhere. I can't check snippets.html since
> its revival came just this Summer (but it was in French except for the
> menu).
>
> > As a translator, you're probably building in-tree without a separate
> > build directory? I'll test that kind of setup in a second, maybe
> > there's a problem with that.
> >
>
> I don't remember the reason, but translators were very "annoyed" with
> out-of-tree building.
I think check-translation, update-translation etc. don't work because
they're closely interacting with git and the source tree.
> Thank you for any idea you might dig out!
So it's indeed this setup and I can reproduce the problem when
configuring and building directly in the source tree. Unfortunately, I
suspect this is fallout from
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/347 which would
be a pain to revert. I need to think if I can spot an error in the
include path order and if it's possible to correct without breaking a
bunch of other stuff...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- ready for 2.21.80?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/10/25
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Dan Eble, 2020/10/25
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2020/10/25
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/10/25
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2020/10/25
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?,
Jonas Hahnfeld <=
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/10/25
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/10/26
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jean-Charles Malahieude, 2020/10/26
- Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/10/29
Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Jonas Hahnfeld, 2020/10/29
Re: ready for 2.21.80?, Phil Holmes, 2020/10/31