[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SMuFL Name mapping update, 13 October: Accordionist input needed
From: |
owendlamb |
Subject: |
Re: SMuFL Name mapping update, 13 October: Accordionist input needed |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Oct 2021 21:43:10 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0 |
Regarding "Ped" vs. "Ped.": What exactly do you mean with the sentence
I wonder if there's any way to map a SMuFL base name to a sequence
of Emmentaler glyphs.
Emmentaler has a "Ped" glyph and a "." glyph, but no "Ped." glyph.
SMuFL has a "." glyph and a "Ped." glyph; "Ped" is merely a recommended stylistic
alternate of "Ped.".
It would be nice for the sake of compatibility if, when programs asked for SMuFL's default "Ped." glyph
(which I imagine they'd do often), it got Emmentaler's "Ped" followed by "." rather than simply
"Ped". I just don't know if that can be done painlessly.