[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Prefer luatex for documentation
From: |
Jean Abou Samra |
Subject: |
Re: Prefer luatex for documentation |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Nov 2022 14:05:18 +0100 |
> Le 21 nov. 2022 à 13:46, Luca Fascione <l.fascione@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> Sorry, luatex is like 10yrs old, what's the need for xetex again?
Are you asking this to me (judging from To:/Cc:)? I don’t see one.
> Maybe I could justify pdftex (I really don't quite see it, but maybe)
As said on the MR, it is faster and makes for lighter CI Docker images.
> but xetex seems just arbitrary... Or do you mean for a transition period?
>
> What's the oldest system that this Lilypond would be used on? What's the
> youngest texlive that will run on that system? That's your tex distro of
> reference.
The availability of the various TeX engines is not a problem.
Jean
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, (continued)
Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/11/21
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Luca Fascione, 2022/11/21
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/21
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Luca Fascione, 2022/11/21
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/21
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, David Kastrup, 2022/11/21
- Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/11/22
Re: Prefer luatex for documentation, Jean Abou Samra, 2022/11/21