[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Glyph extents
From: |
Jean Abou Samra |
Subject: |
Glyph extents |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Apr 2023 02:00:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.46.4 (3.46.4-1.fc37) |
I'm trying to understand how glyph extents (are supposed to) work, and having a
hard time.
Here is an example difference that leaves me scratching my head:
\version "2.25.4"
\markup \override #'(box-padding . 0) \overlay {
\with-color "red" \box \dynamic "f"
\with-color "blue" \box \musicglyph "f"
}
As you can see, whether the forte glyph is loaded through
Open_type_font/fetaMusic or Pango_font/fetaText makes a difference in its
vertical extents.
Does anyone see a good reason for that? Does anyone have an idea why it happens?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Glyph extents,
Jean Abou Samra <=