[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Minimum padding after barlines for notes with accidentals?
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: Minimum padding after barlines for notes with accidentals? |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Sep 2006 11:16:37 -0400 |
Hi, Rick!
There is a problem with notes that both start a measure and have an
accidental.
[...] I can't be the first one to notice it).
If you search the archives, you'll see that I've asked this question
a number of times.
And it's also true of other "left-side attachements", e.g., arpeggios.
I've yet to receive a satisfactory response/solution/explanation. =\
What I've been doing in the meantime is manually tweaking the X-
extent of the Accidental (or BarLine) to force the padding, e.g.
\once \override Accidental #'X-extent = #'(-2 . 1) bs
It's definitely a time-consuming process, but I haven't found a
better solution -- if you find one, I'd greatly appreciate hearing
about it! =)
Best,
Kieren.
- Minimum padding after barlines for notes with accidentals?, Rick Hansen (aka RickH), 2006/09/13
- Re: Minimum padding after barlines for notes with accidentals?,
Kieren MacMillan <=
- Re: Minimum padding after barlines for notes with accidentals?, Rick Hansen (aka RickH), 2006/09/13
- Re: Minimum padding after barlines for notes with accidentals?, Kieren MacMillan, 2006/09/13
- Re: Minimum padding after barlines for notes with accidentals?, Rick Hansen (aka RickH), 2006/09/13
- Re: Minimum padding after barlines for notes with accidentals?, Markus Schneider, 2006/09/13
- Re: Minimum padding after barlines for notes with accidentals?, Markus Schneider, 2006/09/13
- Re: Minimum padding after barlines for notes with accidentals?, Markus Schneider, 2006/09/14