[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug causing this barcheck failure?
From: |
Jan Kohnert |
Subject: |
Re: bug causing this barcheck failure? |
Date: |
Sat, 9 May 2009 03:33:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Please do not CC me, I read the list, and discussion should be kept on the
list.
Am Samstag, 9. Mai 2009 schrieben Sie:
> Jan Kohnert wrote:
> > Equal to the second one would be:
> > g,4. fs8 ~ fs2
> > f4. e8 ~ e2
> >
> > There is no 4/4 timing possible in the first example as it is 9/8 in each
> > line...
>
> After looking at it some more I see what you mean, a double-dotted half
> note should be the correct notation, but it also doesn't work.
No, one dot means (the note length)+((the note length)/2), two dots mean (the
note length)+((the note length)/2)+((the note length)/4), so it still must
not work as you would need (the note length)+((the note length)/4).
--
MfG Jan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.