[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tempo mark alignment
From: |
Andrew Hawryluk |
Subject: |
Re: Tempo mark alignment |
Date: |
Thu, 28 May 2009 21:13:28 -0600 |
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Neil Puttock <address@hidden> wrote:
> Adding the context property to switch between the two alignments was a
> quick hack with a serious limitation: if set to align with note
> columns, tempo marks disappear completely when attached to
> multi-measure rests.
>
> A proper solution should be able to determine automatically when to
> attach the tempo mark to prefatory material (favouring time
> signatures) or note columns.
Would the 'automatic' alignment rule be something like this?
if (tempo mark occurs on first beat of measure):
align to prefatory material
else:
align to note column
Or is that over-simplifying things?
Andrew
- Re: Users versus developers (was: Tempo mark alignment), (continued)
- Re: Users versus developers (was: Tempo mark alignment), Ari Torhamo, 2009/05/23
- Re: Users versus developers (was: Tempo mark alignment), Anthony W. Youngman, 2009/05/23
- Re: Users versus developers (was: Tempo mark alignment), Ari Torhamo, 2009/05/23
- Re: Users versus developers (was: Tempo mark alignment), Tim McNamara, 2009/05/23
- Re: Users versus developers (was: Tempo mark alignment), Graham Percival, 2009/05/24
- Re: Users versus developers (was: Tempo mark alignment), Tim McNamara, 2009/05/24
- Re: Users versus developers (was: Tempo mark alignment), Anthony W. Youngman, 2009/05/24
- Re: Users versus developers (was: Tempo mark alignment), Graham Percival, 2009/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: Tempo mark alignment, Jay Anderson, 2009/05/23
- Re: Tempo mark alignment, Neil Puttock, 2009/05/27
- Re: Tempo mark alignment,
Andrew Hawryluk <=
- Re: Tempo mark alignment, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2009/05/29
Re: Tempo mark alignment, Valentin Villenave, 2009/05/23