[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: spacing/breaking issue [time-sensitive]
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: spacing/breaking issue [time-sensitive] |
Date: |
Mon, 31 May 2010 22:29:14 -0400 |
Graham,
> Note that even truly embarrassing mistakes are not Critical --
> those are High. I wouldn't call 884 "truly embarrassing", though.
But "undocumented output suffixes" is?
> At least, not in comparison to various other longstanding bugs.
> (are you starting to understand why I'm so short-tempered when
> people talk about grand new features and the like?)
Because you're not short-tempered when people talk about anything else? ;-p
Cheers,
Kieren.
- Re: spacing/breaking issue [time-sensitive], (continued)
- Re: spacing/breaking issue [time-sensitive], Graham Percival, 2010/05/31
- Re: spacing/breaking issue [time-sensitive], Kieren MacMillan, 2010/05/31
- Re: spacing/breaking issue [time-sensitive], Alexander Kobel, 2010/05/31
- Re: spacing/breaking issue [time-sensitive], Alexander Kobel, 2010/05/31
- Re: spacing/breaking issue [time-sensitive], Graham Percival, 2010/05/31
- Re: spacing/breaking issue [time-sensitive], Kieren MacMillan, 2010/05/31
- Re: spacing/breaking issue [time-sensitive], Graham Percival, 2010/05/31
- Re: spacing/breaking issue [time-sensitive],
Kieren MacMillan <=
- Re: spacing/breaking issue [time-sensitive], Graham Percival, 2010/05/31
- Re: spacing/breaking issue [time-sensitive], Kieren MacMillan, 2010/05/31
- Re: spacing/breaking issue [time-sensitive], Graham Percival, 2010/05/31
- Re: spacing/breaking issue [time-sensitive], Kieren MacMillan, 2010/05/31
- Re: spacing/breaking issue [time-sensitive], Neil Puttock, 2010/05/31
- Re: spacing/breaking issue [time-sensitive], Neil Puttock, 2010/05/31
- Re: spacing/breaking issue [time-sensitive], Kieren MacMillan, 2010/05/31
Re: spacing/breaking issue [time-sensitive], Neil Puttock, 2010/05/31