[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Mar 2012 01:07:45 +0100 |
Hi again,
2012/3/5 David Nalesnik <address@hidden>:
> Hi Harm,
>
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Thomas Morley
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>>
>> Sorry, I've just sent a tarball to Sebastiano. I hope that all is correct.
>
>
> Everything compiles, and you fixed a number of things that didn't need
> fixing--that has to be good enough :)
hope so.
Cheers,
Harm
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, (continued)
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, James, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Graham Percival, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, David Nalesnik, 2012/03/04
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Thomas Morley, 2012/03/29
- Re: LSR updates: was: polychords: a working solution, Phil Holmes, 2012/03/31