|
From: | David Kastrup |
Subject: | Re: Video recording of LilyPond talk at Chemnitz |
Date: | Thu, 24 May 2012 21:37:54 +0200 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Jeff Barnes <address@hidden> writes: >> Let me first tell you that a _separate_ and unannounced mail copy of > >> something _also_ sent to a mailing list is considered quite rude since >> it more often than not forces the recipient to answer the same mail >> twice. > > Point taken. Won't happen again. > >> Please read >> <URL:http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#DoesTheGPLAllowMoney>. > > Yeah, I've read that before. > > Just curious. If there wasn't a free as in beer version of a GPL > software package, wouldn't one logically expect a fork? How does GNU > address that? You can't fork what has not been written yet. -- David Kastrup
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |