[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?
From: |
Frédéric Bron |
Subject: |
Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this? |
Date: |
Sun, 16 Dec 2012 07:03:44 +0100 |
> Did you do any performance testing, to see if compilation times are optimized
> this way? (I'm finding performance to be somewhat critical, especially when
> generating my large opera and musical scores.)
I did not checked another method to see if it was quicker to build.
You can see that the score is already pretty large and that's true
that it was quite long to compile but I doubt it is because of the
text lines.
Frédéric
- what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?, Kieren MacMillan, 2012/12/14
- Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?, Frédéric Bron, 2012/12/15
- Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?, Kieren MacMillan, 2012/12/17
- Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?, address@hidden, 2012/12/17
- Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?, Frédéric Bron, 2012/12/17
- Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?, Kieren MacMillan, 2012/12/17
- Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?, Thomas Morley, 2012/12/17
- Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?, Kieren MacMillan, 2012/12/17
- Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?, Frédéric Bron, 2012/12/17
- Re: what's the most "efficient" way of doing this?, Kieren MacMillan, 2012/12/17