[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fonts from the former fonts.openlilylib.org
From: |
Urs Liska |
Subject: |
Re: Fonts from the former fonts.openlilylib.org |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Mar 2016 20:36:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
K-9 Mail for Android |
Am 26. März 2016 19:58:01 MEZ, schrieb Carl Sorensen <address@hidden>:
>On 3/26/16 12:09 PM, "Abraham Lee" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>If there are no objections, I will provide you with the latest files
>that
>>existed at the time I closed up shop. I can't stop you from hosting
>them,
>>but if I can request one thing, I'd appreciate it. Would you please
>stop
>>hosting when my new site is made
>> public? That would help me a lot since I'm really the only one who
>can
>>provide full support at the moment and I'd like to minimize the number
>of
>>different versions I'm supporting. Thanks!
>
>
>I appreciate your willingness to share the files that existed at the
>time
>of closing up the shop.
>
>I totally understand the issues of not wanting to have to support
>multiple
>versions, and I'd like to be very supportive of you and your latest
>versions.
>
>I'm concerned, though, about people who have successfully used your
>free
>versions, and then find that the newer version of the font is no longer
>free, but is proprietary. I think that having a proprietary font is
>inconsistent with free software.
I would say the "inconsistency", if aby, is that Abraham didn't make the fonts
proprietary right from the start.
I would see it the other way round: commercial fonts that happen to have free
ancestors.
>I'm not opposed to you having
>proprietary versions of your fonts. I'm not opposed to having the
>proprietary versions of the font work with LilyPond. But I'm concerned
>about having proprietary fonts advertised in LilyPond's official
>website,
>documentation, and mailing lists.
Are they advertised in the website or docs? If so that should of course be
modified by using free fonts as examples. But I don't think that even is the
case.
>
>How would you feel about having a git repository of the fonts, with
>clear
>labeling that the fonts are not your latest and are not supported by
>you,
>as a historical repository of the old version of the fonts?
That might be an idea.
Urs
>
>Thanks,
>
>Carl
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>lilypond-user mailing list
>address@hidden
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
- Fonts from the former fonts.openlilylib.org, Carl Sorensen, 2016/03/26
- Re: Fonts from the former fonts.openlilylib.org, Abraham Lee, 2016/03/26
- Re: Fonts from the former fonts.openlilylib.org, Carl Sorensen, 2016/03/26
- Re: Fonts from the former fonts.openlilylib.org,
Urs Liska <=
- Re: Fonts from the former fonts.openlilylib.org, Andrew Bernard, 2016/03/26
- Re: Fonts from the former fonts.openlilylib.org, tyronicus, 2016/03/26
- Re: Fonts from the former fonts.openlilylib.org, Andrew Bernard, 2016/03/26
- Re: Fonts from the former fonts.openlilylib.org, Abraham Lee, 2016/03/26
- Re: Fonts from the former fonts.openlilylib.org, N. Andrew Walsh, 2016/03/27
- Re: Fonts from the former fonts.openlilylib.org, tisimst, 2016/03/27
- Re: Fonts from the former fonts.openlilylib.org, Urs Liska, 2016/03/27
- Re: Fonts from the former fonts.openlilylib.org, bart deruyter, 2016/03/27
- Re: Fonts from the former fonts.openlilylib.org, Abraham Lee, 2016/03/27
- Re: Fonts from the former fonts.openlilylib.org, Paul Morris, 2016/03/27