[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New LilyPond website
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: New LilyPond website |
Date: |
Tue, 07 Feb 2017 07:00:23 +0100 (CET) |
>> OK, I was asking because I have written a static command line HTML
>> site generator that builds from HTML, Markdown, reStruturedText,
>> Textile, Plain Text (.txt), and Microsoft Word (.docx).
>>
>> http://jmroper.com/blended
>
> I am not convinced that that changing our HTML generation is in our
> best interest at this time.
>
> Design is almost entirely a question of CSS. I'd like to see some
> serious effort at improving the CSS, since that it 99% of the
> user-visible changes, and does not negatively impact the rest of our
> code. Again, I suggest that you look at:
> https://github.com/gperciva/lilypond-web-css
>
> If there is a need to style a particular element that currently
> lacks an id= or class= name, I'd be quite happy to add that to our
> existing texinfo and static site generation.
I think there are two separate issues.
(1) Update the CSS to make the web page visually more pleasing.
(2) Change the input syntax for the *web page* to something more
common and more flexible than texinfo, e.g., markdown + templates.
Both are reasonable IMHO, especially (1). The question is whether and
how much of (2) we want.
John, can you set up
http://jmroper.com/lilypond/
with `blended' together with a README so that we can inspect the
source code, CSS, etc., and the necessary steps to create it? I think
only a direct comparison can answer our questions.
Werner
- Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website], (continued)
- Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website], John Roper, 2017/02/04
- Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website], Simon Albrecht, 2017/02/04
- Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website], David Kastrup, 2017/02/04
- Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website], John Roper, 2017/02/04
- Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website], David Kastrup, 2017/02/04
- Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website], John Roper, 2017/02/04
- Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website], David Kastrup, 2017/02/04
- Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website], Urs Liska, 2017/02/04
- Re: Blended, static site generator [WAS: Re: New LilyPond website], David Kastrup, 2017/02/04
Re: New LilyPond website, Graham Percival, 2017/02/06
- Re: New LilyPond website,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: New LilyPond website, John Roper, 2017/02/07
- Re: New LilyPond website, Werner LEMBERG, 2017/02/08
- Re: New LilyPond website, John Roper, 2017/02/08
- Re: New LilyPond website, David Kastrup, 2017/02/08
- Re: New LilyPond website, David Kastrup, 2017/02/08
- Re: New LilyPond website, John Roper, 2017/02/08
- Re: New LilyPond website, Shane Brandes, 2017/02/08
- Re: New LilyPond website, Michael Gerdau, 2017/02/09
- Re: New LilyPond website, John Roper, 2017/02/09
- Re: New LilyPond website, Marc Mouries, 2017/02/09