[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilypond.org Productions page
From: |
Jan-Peter Voigt |
Subject: |
Re: lilypond.org Productions page |
Date: |
Wed, 5 Dec 2018 16:51:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 |
Hi there,
2017/2018 Ortus published the "Markus Passion" by Johann Sebastian Bach
in a reconstructed version by Andreas Fischer:
http://www.ortus-musikverlag.de/en/musik-elbe-oder/om212
(right now the introduction is only available in german, sorry)
LilyPond is not mentioned there, but I created the scores (full-score,
piano-reduction, vocal-score, instrument-parts) with the Gonville font,
using the edition-engraver and with my own templating engine.
If there would be some time I would write an article for
http://lilypondblog.org/ ...
Jan-Peter
Am 03.12.18 um 09:22 schrieb Urs Liska:
> Hi Federico,
>
> Am 03.12.18 um 08:53 schrieb Federico Bruni:
>> Hello
>>
>> I was about to send a patch to add a website in the Productions page
>> (sheets are CC licensed, subscription required):
>> https://www.baroquemusic.it/
>>
>> Then I realized that 3 out of 4 projects listed under "Published sheet
>> music" section are discontinued.
>> Should we just delete them?
>> http://lilypond.org/website/productions.html
>
>
> You're right, this is quite embarrassing. However, if we remove
> everything but Mutopia, it will look even more embarrassing, isn't it? I
> have problems with such pages (applies equally to "News" pages) that
> reveal more a *lack* of content and activity.
>
> I think we should rather try to do a general collection among users (but
> this should reach more channels than just this list) to get a number of
> new entries for the page that makes it a little more impressive.
>
>> Which are the requirements (if any) to be listed on that page? Should
>> we link only projects following Free Software principles?
>
>
> Yes. When Janek and I wanted to use the award for our Oskar Fried
> edition to put some spotlight on LilyPond we could not get it added to
> this page. All we could get agreement to was adding a News item about
> the fact that we used a crowdfunding campain trying to make it possible
> to open source the edition.
>
>
>>
>>
>> If you know of any other project which may be listed there please let
>> me know.
>>
>
> I will have two projects, but it will need a number of months before
> they are ready and (in one case) can be publicly disclosed.
>
> Best
> Urs
>
>
>> Thanks
>> Federico
- Re: lilypond.org Productions page, (continued)
- Re: lilypond.org Productions page, Carl Sorensen, 2018/12/09
- Re: lilypond.org Productions page, Urs Liska, 2018/12/09
- Re: lilypond.org Productions page, David Kastrup, 2018/12/09
- Re: lilypond.org Productions page, Ralph Palmer, 2018/12/09
- lilypond.org Productions page, marc.lanoiselee, 2018/12/09
- Re: lilypond.org Productions page, Federico Bruni, 2018/12/10
- Re: lilypond.org Productions page, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2018/12/11
- Re: lilypond.org Productions page, Paul Morris, 2018/12/12
- Re: lilypond.org Productions page, Carl Sorensen, 2018/12/09
- Re: lilypond.org Productions page, David Kastrup, 2018/12/09
Re: lilypond.org Productions page,
Jan-Peter Voigt <=
Re: lilypond.org Productions page, Federico Bruni, 2018/12/08