[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly
From: |
Johan Vromans |
Subject: |
Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Dec 2018 13:47:32 +0100 |
On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:21:44 +0100, Urs Liska <address@hidden> wrote:
> It sounds reasonable to drop the current abc2ly implementation. However,
> I think we shouldn't do this without somehow including abc2xml in the
> distribution and (probably) create a wrapper script abc2ly that
> transparently replaces the old implementation and calls abc2xml |
> musicxml2ly instead.
Sounds like simple and effective to me.
-- Johan
- Re: Status and future of abc2ly, (continued)
- Re: Status and future of abc2ly, David Kastrup, 2018/12/10
- Re: Status and future of abc2ly, Andrew Bernard, 2018/12/10
- Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly, Rutger Hofman, 2018/12/10
- Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly, Martin Tarenskeen, 2018/12/10
- Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly, Andrew Bernard, 2018/12/10
- Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly, Urs Liska, 2018/12/10
- Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly, Andrew Bernard, 2018/12/10
- Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly, Laura Conrad, 2018/12/13
- Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly, Andrew Bernard, 2018/12/14
- Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly, David Wright, 2018/12/14
- Re: [Spam] Re: Status and future of abc2ly,
Johan Vromans <=
Re: Status and future of abc2ly, Jean Louis Thiry, 2018/12/10