--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: How does GPL3 stack up against KHTML/Safari exploitation? |
Date: |
Wed, 04 Jul 2007 12:49:25 +0200 |
* quanta:
> For those who don't remembered the incident, Apple developed its
> Safari based on KHTML's work, but Apple only distributed changes in
> large patches with little documentation, and refused to allow KHTML
> developer to look at the change logs maintained by Apple. How does
> GPL3 licence prevent such kind of abuse,
The GPLv3 does not require detailed changelogs. The requirements are
even below those of the GPLv2. I suspect that this just reflects
reality because most developers (not just Apple) did not pay attention
to that part of the GPLv2 anyway.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
confirm aec07b99a893292951cedc2482ce0ad2b1a302d5 |
If you reply to this message, keeping the Subject: header intact,
Mailman will discard the held message. Do this if the message is
spam. If you reply to this message and include an Approved: header
with the list password in it, the message will be approved for posting
to the list. The Approved: header can also appear in the first line
of the body of the reply.
--- End Message ---