[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sugestion for Lout - token stack
From: |
Jeff Kingston |
Subject: |
Re: sugestion for Lout - token stack |
Date: |
Sun, 24 Mar 2002 10:36:54 +1100 |
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002 19:23:50 +0100 (CET), Erich Hoffmann wrote:
>
> Excuse me, does that mean the end of lout, or will there be a sort of
> compatibility? (E.g. similiar syntax or symbols & requests.) Your
> *entirely new* make me doubt.
>
> erich
I will maintain Lout for as long as people want me to. But the new
system should have all of Lout's virtues and none of its defects, so
over time I hope people will migrate to it.
Jeff Kingston
- sugestion for Lout - token stack, Basile STARYNKEVITCH, 2002/03/22
- Re: sugestion for Lout - token stack, Jeff Kingston, 2002/03/22
- Re: sugestion for Lout - token stack, Erich Hoffmann, 2002/03/23
- Re: sugestion for Lout - token stack,
Jeff Kingston <=
- Re: sugestion for Lout - token stack, Oliver Bandel, 2002/03/24
- Re: sugestion for Lout - token stack, Jeff Kingston, 2002/03/24
- Re: sugestion for Lout - token stack, Oliver Bandel, 2002/03/25
- Re: sugestion for Lout - token stack, Giovanni Zezza, 2002/03/25
- Re: sugestion for Lout - token stack, Oliver Bandel, 2002/03/30
- Re: sugestion for Lout - token stack, Giovanni Zezza, 2002/03/31
- Jeff's new programming language (Re: sugestion for Lout - token stack), Oliver Bandel, 2002/03/30