[lwip-devel] [task #14420] Remove sys_sem_signal from inside SYS_ARCH_PROTECT crit section

[Simon Goldschmidt]

Follow-up Comment #7, task #14420 (project lwip):

> is this even the start of not investing time into improving 
> the non-core locking case because it's not the default locking 
> mechanism and performs worse?

It's exactly that. It performs worse unless you have a really strange system.
Even with COMPAT_MUTEX it should be better as the traditional message-passing
way doesn't fix priority inversion, too. I have a vague plan of getting rid of
the non-core-locking code some day but haven't planned it yet ;-)

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?14420>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/