lwip-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [lwip-users] Non-blocking netconn_write?


From: Dany Thiffeault
Subject: Re: [lwip-users] Non-blocking netconn_write?
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:10:47 -0400

"This is a common problem, but it's just the way that the sockets API and
TCP are designed: they try to be resilient to connection breakages and
hope that the connection comes back.  I would suggest using a different
thread to monitor the link state (not through lwIP) and base your
decisions about connectivity on that."

Yeah, that's what I was thinking. Don't worry about the safety, it's just that our product is used in environments that are restricted by many rules, so we need to fit everything :)


On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Kieran Mansley <address@hidden> wrote:
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 09:25 -0400, Dany Thiffeault wrote:
> Thanks Kieran.
>
>
> Well... a non-blocking call returning an error would be great for me
> if there is a connection problem. I could then detect an error when
> writing the packet and close the connection and shutdown some stuff
> for safety of people around the device.

"for safety"?  That worries me!

> I have a device that is acquiring data and streaming everything on
> Ethernet. So, the majority of the time when streaming, the application
> is writing data on the Ethernet port. So, if I disconnect the Ethernet
> cable or another communication problem occurs that "hangs" the thread
> in the netconn_write function, I cannot detect it.

This is a common problem, but it's just the way that the sockets API and
TCP are designed: they try to be resilient to connection breakages and
hope that the connection comes back.  I would suggest using a different
thread to monitor the link state (not through lwIP) and base your
decisions about connectivity on that.

Kieran



_______________________________________________
lwip-users mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lwip-users


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]