[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation.
From: |
Drazen Kacar |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation. |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Dec 1996 01:26:26 +0100 (MET) |
David Combs wrote:
> I still think that, for Solaris, an EXTRA (over and above the
> "normal" solaris release) would be a "PACKAGE". Sure makes
> the system administrator's life easier.
There's no end to fun packages a man like you could produce. :)
And, when talking about Solaris binaries, would you all specify which
Solaris? There is Solaris x86, somewhat binary non compatible with
SPARC Solaris. And it's really not Solaris, it's SunOS 5.x.
--
Life is a sexually transmitted disease.
address@hidden
address@hidden
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., (continued)
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Michael Richardson, 1996/12/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Christopher R. Maden, 1996/12/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Duncan Hill, 1996/12/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Subir Grewal, 1996/12/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Drazen Kacar, 1996/12/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Duncan Hill, 1996/12/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1996/12/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Michael Richardson, 1996/12/06
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., David Woolley, 1996/12/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., David Combs, 1996/12/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation.,
Drazen Kacar <=
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Robert Bonomi, 1996/12/06
- Re: LYNX-DEV Binary distribution: an evaluation., Robert Bonomi, 1996/12/07