[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev Black background wanted
From: |
T.E.Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev Black background wanted |
Date: |
Fri, 29 May 1998 20:44:41 -0400 (EDT) |
> > > ...but there were errors when running make:-
> > > ../include/ncurses_cfg.h:51: warning: `GCC_' redefined
> > > ../include/ncurses_cfg.h:50: warning: this is the location of the
> > there's a substitution missing -- the "GCC_" is the first part of
> > a name such as "GCC_UNUSED". So something's amiss with your environment.
>
> Not surprising really...
>
> Any ideas where to look? emx, autoconf, ksh, config.sys...
I'd look in the shell first. It's generated in the macro CF_GCC_ATTRIBUTES
(in aclocal.m4).
If it's the only place, you can comment-out the call for that from
configure.in, since (I think) there's fallback definitions in the
header files. But I assume that something's amiss with one of the
tools, and you may get other problems. (This would be a problem
processing a here-document - but different from what I had).
To debug - I set the "-x" option of the shell, and redirect it to
a file, or in vile, I read it directly into a buffer, e.g.,
^X!configure
(that's a control/X). I don't know what sort of tools you have.
There's an executable for OS/2 VIO vile on my webpage.
> > > previous definition
> > > make[1]: *** [make_hash.exe] Error 1
> > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/ncurses-4.2/ncurses'
> > > make: *** [all] Error 2
> > >
> > > There is so much scope for error, but I'm amazed I got this far.
> > >
> > > Is this getting too far off-topic for this list?
> > maybe. I put some comparable stuff from my last build (5 weeks ago)
> > in
> > http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey/lynx/lynx/patches/emx-ncurses.zip
>
> Too many lynx in there :-) but I did mange to track it down...
ok (too fast to paste)
> > It won't be identical, but you can use it for comparison.
>
> Many thanks,
no problem -
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey